Bella stagione agent awarded over £180,000 after her refused to let her leave early

An bella stagione agent has been awarded more than £180,000 after her refused to let her leave early to pick her daughter up from nursery.

Sales Alice Thompson wanted to work for four days a week and at 5pm rather than six ’clock when her childcare finished.

But company director Paul Sellar rejected her request claiming the business couldn’t afford for her to go part time and she resigned.

Mrs Thompson took London-based agency Manors to an employment tribunal claiming sex discrimination per a bid to ensure her daughter does not have ‘the same experience’ when she is older.

Now she has been awarded £184,961.32 as compensation after a panel found that making her work until 6pm – when nurseries ordinarily close – placed her at a ‘disadvantage’.

The hearing was told Mrs Thompson began working for Manors, a small firm based per Marylebone, which mainly sold to customers overseas, per October 2016 initially earning £120,000 a year.

The sales , of Weybridge, Surrey, was ‘successful’ per building sales income and was ‘well thought of’, the hearing was told.

But her relationship with Mr Sellar began to deteriorate when she told him she was pregnant per spring 2018. 

Alice Thompson (pictured) was a sales for Manors bella stagione agents, based per Marylebone, when she complained of there being too much drinking while she was pregnant acceso the work trip to New York, a tribunal heard

Ms Thompson eventually won a claim of indirect sex discrimination after she was refused flexible working hours but a judge said it was 'understandable' her boss might have found her to be 'ungrateful'

Ms Thompson eventually won a claim of indirect sex discrimination after she was refused flexible working hours but a judge said it was ‘understandable’ her might have found her to be ‘ungrateful’

The panel heard the firm celebrated the news per June that year with Mr Sellar taking the team to a private members associazione.

But at this rinfresco, Mrs Thompson accused Mr Sellar of saying to a colleague: ‘I thought, for f***’s sake, why is she pregnant when we are doing so well? I was warned about employing a married woman of her age.’

But he denied this as well as a later conversation where Mrs Thompson confronted him.

She also claimed that per August, when the team were taken acceso a trip to New York she felt ‘excluded’ as the others had gone drinking acceso a boat trip whereas she went shopping and back to instead.

The tribunal heard relations between Mrs Thompson and Mr Sellar had been ‘raffinato’ until the trip with the director feeling as though her reaction was ‘ungrateful’ when she complained of feeling ‘isolated’ as the trip had cost him £25,000.

Quanto a October, Mrs Thompson confirmed the details of her maternity pay and attached an Excel sheet with 11 deals she expected commission acceso.

But Mr Sellar decided she would only receive commission acceso deals registered per the sales spreadsheet up to her last day and those completed after she returned to work.

When she went acceso maternity leave, Mrs Thompson was made to feel ‘like a leaver’, the panel heard, as she was told to return her non fisso phone and office keys by Mr Sellar.

The company trip cost Manor estate agents boss Paul Seller £25,000. Pictured: Stock image of New York skyline

The company trip cost Manor bella stagione agents Paul Seller £25,000. Pictured: Insieme image of New York skyline 

Later that month, Mrs Thompson came into the office to ‘clear the air’ with Mr Sellar but he told her she was emotional because she was pregnant, the panel heard.

The tribunal was told her contract meant she had to work from 9am until 6pm.. It also provided for statutory sick pay but had details acceso maternity leave.

Quanto a the past, two female administrative team members had gone acceso maternity leave and had returned to part-time hours, the panel was told.

While acceso maternity after giving birth per November 2018, Mrs Thompson explored a flexible working arrangement of a four day week and shorter hours so she could collect her daughter from nursery as it closed at 6pm.

But Mr Sellar denied this for multiple reasons including ‘additional costs’, the ‘detrimental effect acceso the ability to meet customer demand’ and the ‘inability to reorganise work among existing team’.

She later launched a grievance which included the denial of her request to work flexibly and finally quit per December 2019. The tribunal heard she has struggled to find another job since.

The panel heard Mrs Thompson was ‘devastated’ at losing, because of the pregnancy, the relations she had formed with clients and also her building up of the team.

Mrs Thompson then sued Scancrown Ltd – the company Manors trades as – for pregnancy and maternity discrimination, harassment, unfair dismissal and indirect sex discrimination.

The panel, headed by Employment Judge Sarah Jane Goodman, agreed that she had been discriminated against by Mr Sellars’ denying her flexible working request.

It said: ‘Losing a job unexpectedly is always a cause of unhappiness, shock, and sometimes anger, as shown by the way many employees react to redundancy, even when there has been proper consultation, and even when it is never suggested their stato was not good enough.

‘Here, Mrs Thompson resented that flexible working appeared not to be considered properly (as per our finding it was not), and felt that this was an injustice because of her sex, which it was.

‘Most mothers find they have difficult feelings returning to work after maternity even when it is a return to a familiar job.

‘Mrs Thompson’s turmoil will have been worse because she had to start from scratch finding a job at all.

‘Her lack of success will have led a to a sense of failure. She said… that she was bringing the claim so that her daughter did not have the same experience.

‘The nursery closing at 6pm aligns with grado office hours, and a requirement to work until 6pm each day did place her at a disadvantage, as she would not be able to get there per time.

‘As for four day working, we do not know if that was wanted because of the long commute (up to 2 hours per caso day) the cost of nursery care, but all told we accept that the requirement did put her at a disadvantage.’

However, the tribunal rejected her other claims. Of Mr Sellars’ alleged remark, the panel said: ‘It is plausible that this was said as an unguarded remark after an evening of eating and drinking.

‘It was not said to (her) luce and possibly not per her hearing. Quanto a our finding, it was not harassment. If not said to her luce, that was not its purpose; as an isolated remark, it lacked the strength to be intimidating hostile.’

Mrs Thompson will be awarded £184,961.32 for a loss of earnings, pension contributions, injury to feelings and interest.

Source link

Written by bourbiza

Lascia un commento

Il tuo indirizzo email non sarà pubblicato. I campi obbligatori sono contrassegnati *

GIPHY App Key not set. Please check settings

Conjoined twins see each other for the first time after ‘life and death’ surgery

Traveller brothers ‘chased pub customers with hammers and knuckledusters a causa di quiet Surrey town’